By Paula Span, KFF Well being Information
A protracted checklist of Lynda Hollander’s paternal relations had coronary heart illness, and several other had undergone main surgical procedures. So when she hit her mid-50s and noticed her levels of cholesterol creeping up after menopause, she mentioned, “I didn’t need to take an opportunity.”
A heart specialist informed Hollander that primarily based on components like age, intercourse, ldl cholesterol, and blood strain, she confronted a average danger of a significant cardiac occasion, like a coronary heart assault, inside the subsequent 10 years.
Docs sometimes counsel such sufferers in regards to the significance of weight loss plan and train, however Hollander, now 64, a social employee in West Orange, New Jersey, didn’t have a lot room for enchancment. She was already a critical runner, and though “I fall off the wagon occasionally,” her weight loss plan was principally wholesome. Makes an attempt to drop extra pounds didn’t decrease her ldl cholesterol.
Her physician defined {that a} coronary artery calcium take a look at, one thing Hollander had by no means heard of, may present a extra exact estimate of her danger of atherosclerotic coronary heart illness. Her physician defined {that a} coronary artery calcium take a look at, one thing Ms. Hollander had by no means heard of, may present a extra exact estimate of her danger of atherosclerotic coronary heart illness. A short and painless CT scan, it could point out whether or not the fatty deposits known as plaque have been creating within the arteries resulting in her coronary heart.
When plaque ruptures, it might probably trigger clots that block blood movement and set off coronary heart assaults. The scan would assist decide whether or not Hollander would profit from taking a statin, which may cut back plaque and forestall extra from forming.
“The take a look at is utilized by extra folks yearly,” mentioned Michael Blaha, co-director of the preventive cardiology program at Johns Hopkins College. Calcium scans quadrupled from 2006 to 2017, his analysis workforce reported, and Google searches for associated phrases have risen much more sharply.
But “it’s nonetheless being underused in comparison with its worth,” he mentioned.
One motive is that though the take a look at is relatively cheap — typically as much as $300, however usually $100 or much less — sufferers often should pay for it out-of-pocket. Medicare hardly ever covers it, although some docs argue that it ought to.
Sufferers with a CAC rating of zero — no calcification — have decrease danger than their preliminary assessments point out and aren’t candidates for cholesterol-lowering medicine. However Hollander’s rating was within the 50s — not excessive however not negligible.
“It was the primary indication of what was happening inside my arteries,” she mentioned.
Although pointers differ, cardiologists typically provide statins to sufferers with calcium scores over zero, and counsel larger depth statins when scores exceed 100. At over 300, sufferers’ dangers method these of people that’ve already had coronary heart assaults; they could want nonetheless extra aggressive therapy.
Hollander has taken a low dose of rosuvastatin (model identify: Crestor) ever since, supplemented by a non-statin drug, a shot known as evolocumab (Repatha).
That is the best way calcium testing is meant to work. It’s not a screening take a look at for everybody. It’s meant just for chosen asymptomatic sufferers, ages 40 to 75, who’ve by no means had a coronary heart assault or a stroke and usually are not already on ldl cholesterol medicine.
The take a look at helps reply a pointed query: to statin, or to not statin.
If a health care provider calculates the 10-year danger of atherosclerotic heart problems at 5% or decrease, medicine are pointless for now. Over 20%, “there’s little question the danger is sufficiently excessive to justify treatment,” mentioned Philip Greenland, a preventive heart specialist at Northwestern College and co-author of a current assessment in JAMA.
“It’s the in-between vary the place it’s extra unsure,” he mentioned, together with “borderline” danger of 5% to 7.5% and “intermediate” danger of seven.5% to twenty%.
Why add one other measurement to those assessments, which already incorporate danger components like smoking and diabetes?
“A danger rating is derived from a big inhabitants, with mathematical modeling,” Blaha defined. “We are able to say that this rating describes the danger of coronary heart illness amongst hundreds of individuals. However there are many limitations in making use of them to at least one particular person.”
A calcium scan, nonetheless, produces a picture of 1 particular person’s arteries. Alexander Zheutlin, a cardiology fellow and researcher at Northwestern College, reveals sufferers their photographs, in order that they will see the lighter-colored calcifications.
Cardiologists are typically followers of calcium testing, as a result of they so repeatedly encounter sufferers who’re reluctant to take statins. Individuals who really feel nice could hesitate to begin medicine they’ll take for the remainder of their lives, regardless of statins’ confirmed historical past of lowering coronary heart assaults, strokes and cardiac deaths.
In 2019, a survey of just about 5,700 adults for whom statin remedy was really helpful discovered {that a} quarter weren’t in therapy. Of these, 10% had declined a statin and 30% had began after which discontinued, primarily citing worry of negative effects.
An American Faculty of Cardiology knowledgeable consensus report not too long ago put the speed of muscle ache, statin customers’ most typical criticism, at 5% to twenty%. Researchers contemplate the worry of negative effects overblown, citing research displaying that studies of muscle ache have been comparable whether or not sufferers took statins or placebos.
“The precise danger is way, a lot decrease than the perceived danger,” Zheutlin mentioned.
Which may be little consolation to people who find themselves in ache, however cardiologists argue that lowering doses or switching to totally different statins often solves the issue. Some sufferers will do higher on a non-statin ldl cholesterol drug.
Hollander, for instance, suffered “muscle cramps that will wake me up at evening.” Her physician suggested fewer doses, so Hollander now takes Crestor three days per week and self-injects Repatha twice month-to-month.
(Statins additionally carry a really low danger of a harmful situation, rhabdomyolysis, that causes muscle breakdown, they usually barely enhance the prospect of diabetes.)
Some caveats: Nobody has undertaken a randomized medical trial to point out whether or not calcium testing finally reduces coronary heart assaults and cardiac deaths. That’s why, though a number of skilled associations endorse calcium scans to assist decide therapy, the impartial U.S. Preventive Providers Process Power has known as the present proof “inadequate” to advocate widespread use.
Such a trial can be costly and troublesome to mount, with many confounding variables. And pharmaceutical corporations aren’t desirous to underwrite one, since a profitable end result may imply that sufferers with zero scores keep away from ldl cholesterol medicine altogether.
However a current Australian examine of asymptomatic sufferers with household histories of coronary artery illness discovered that, after three years, those that had undergone calcium scans had sustained a discount in ldl cholesterol and a considerably decrease danger of coronary heart illness than those that had not been examined.
The take a look at “results in extra statin prescriptions, higher adherence to statins, much less development of atherosclerosis, and fewer plaque progress,” Greenland mentioned of the examine, by which he was not concerned. “It suggestions the size.”
One other concern: folks age 75 and older. Most can have arterial plaque, making a scan’s profit “much less clear-cut,” mentioned Zheutlin, lead writer of a current JAMA Cardiology article mentioning that CAC testing may be each overused and underused.
As a result of older adults face extra persistent ailments and medical points, cholesterol-lowering could turn out to be a decrease precedence. A examine now enrolling individuals over 75 ought to reply some questions on statins, calcium scans, and dementia in a couple of years.
In the meantime, cardiologists see calcium scans as a persuasive device.
“It’s extremely irritating,” Zheutlin mentioned. With statins, “we now have low-cost, secure, efficient medicine obtainable at any pharmacy” that assist stop coronary heart assaults. If CAC take a look at outcomes show extra influential than conventional danger assessments alone, he mentioned, extra sufferers may conform to take them.
A calcium scan helped Stephen Patrick, 70, a retired tech government in San Francisco, attain that time. “For years, I used to be borderline on ldl cholesterol, and I managed to beat it again with much less cheese toast” and many train, he mentioned. “I used to be on no meds, and I took satisfaction in that.”
Final fall, with each his complete and his LDL ldl cholesterol larger than really helpful, his physician advised a calcium scan. His rating: 176.
He’s taking atorvastatin (Lipitor) day by day, and his levels of cholesterol have dropped dramatically. “I might need tried it anyway,” he mentioned. “However the calcium rating meant I needed to pay extra consideration.”
The New Previous Age is produced by a partnership with The New York Occasions.
©2025 KFF Well being Information. Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.